most interesting rulings | In Principle

Go to content
Subscribe to newsletter
In principle newsletter subscription form

most interesting rulings

One resolution, many doubts
The Supreme Court has ruled that it is impermissible to issue a commercial proxy to one person allowing the proxy to act only jointly with a member of the management board. What does this ruling mean for companies that have already issued such proxies?
One resolution, many doubts
How precisely should a licence for use of an industrial design be worded?
Contracts are signed expecting the worst. The provisions should be precisely formulated, particularly when a failure to be explicit can lead to application of rigid statutory provisions instead. When a dispute arises, the court’s interpretation of the parties’ intent may differ from the literal wording of the contract.
How precisely should a licence for use of an industrial design be worded?
Bank enforcement titles are unconstitutional: What next?
Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal has held that bank enforcement titles are contrary to the Polish Constitution because they violate the constitutional principle of equality. Pursuant to this judgment, the relevant provisions of the Banking Law—Art. 96(1) and Art. 97(1)—will cease to be in force on 1 August 2016. The ruling is fundamentally important for the entire banking sector and for bank customers.
Bank enforcement titles are unconstitutional: What next?
New criterion for evaluating product safety
The Court of Justice of the European Union has held that the probability of a defect can make a product defective.
New criterion for evaluating product safety
After a judgment is set aside on interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court, the case can be reconsidered by the very same judges
The panel of judges must be changed after a ruling is overturned and remanded for reconsideration only in the case of a ruling on the merits of the specific dispute. This is not the case for proceedings commenced by an interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court on procedural issues.
After a judgment is set aside on interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court, the case can be reconsidered by the very same judges
Converting perpetual usufruct into ownership: Unconstitutional giveaway from local governments to private businesses
Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal has held that regulations giving economic entities the right to demand conversion of perpetual usufruct of land into ownership violate constitutional principles of social justice and local government autonomy.
Converting perpetual usufruct into ownership: Unconstitutional giveaway from local governments to private businesses
Using someone else’s database
What is the scope of legal protection of databases? Can lawful users make unlimited use of them? Can the creator of the database limit access to it? The courts had to address these issues in a dispute between an airline and an operator of an online search engine for discount air tickets.
Using someone else’s database
Arabic for “Coke”? Master Cola isn’t it
When examining the similarity of trademarks, the typeface in which verbal elements of the marks are written must be considered, the EU’s General Court ruled in a recent judgment on reputed trademarks.
Arabic for “Coke”? Master Cola isn’t it
Planning and environmental damage
The act of planning and preparation for a venture cannot be regarded as an “activity” causing an imminent threat of environmental damage.
Planning and environmental damage
What a difference a minute makes: To receive or not receive compensation for a flight delay
In strictly defined instances a passenger has the right to compensation for a flight delay, but the law does not say exactly how the period of the delay should be calculated. The European Court of Justice recently answered this question.
What a difference a minute makes: To receive or not receive compensation for a flight delay
If contractors aren’t sure, are they required to speak up?
Under some circumstances, questioning the terms of reference in a tender may be treated not only as a right but as an obligation of a professional contractor.
If contractors aren’t sure, are they required to speak up?
Offers may be evaluated on the basis of a presentation made after opening of the bids
The National Appeal Chamber has held that it is permissible after opening the bids in an unrestricted tender to hold an exam in which the experts offered are evaluated, and for the points awarded on the exam to serve as a criterion for evaluation of the offers.
Offers may be evaluated on the basis of a presentation made after opening of the bids